Episode 1.6: Public Education as an Autocratic Project, with Agustina Paglayan

Also available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts

In this conversation, we talk with Dr. Agustina Paglayan, an assistant professor of political science at UC San Diego, about her project “The Dark Side of Education,” an examination of the spread of mass primary schooling around the world. Paglayan recently published an article on the topic in the American Political Science Review and has a larger book project underway expanding on this research. 

In this project, Paglayan seeks to challenge a great deal of what we think we know about the spread of primary education around the world. Common understandings of the expansion of public education take a pretty benign view of its origins. Previous scholarship has tended to argue that states expanded primary schooling to invest in human capital, to redistribute to the poor, or to promote economic development. Scholars have also contended that the spread of education was largely a democratic project, as a response to popular demands following democratization.

Paglayan has quite a different story to tell about how primary schooling became broadly available around the world. Drawing on a wealth of historical evidence, she argues that it wasn’t democrats but dictators who extended primary education to the masses. Moreover, in most cases, she contends, governments expanded primary schooling not as a concession to the poor, but as a tool for silencing dissent, undermining rebellion, and reinforcing their hold on power.

In our conversation, Paglayan advances these arguments by tying together rich knowledge of the cases she studies (such as 19th-century Prussia, Chile, and the Jim Crow American South), an original comparative-historical dataset on the expansion of education around the world, and careful thinking about drawing causal inferences from cross-national, time-series data. This was a fascinating discussion that changed the way we think about the politics of education. 

Figures discussed in the episode (from Paglayan’s APSR article):

Screen Shot 2020-12-13 at 1.42.00 PM.png
 

Works discussed in the episode:

Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Albertus, Michael, and Victor Menaldo. 2014. “Gaming Democracy: Elite Dominance during Transition and the Prospects for Eedistribution.” British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), pp. 575–603.

Ansell, Ben W. 2008. “Traders, Teachers, and Tyrants: Democracy, Globalization, and Public Investment in Education.” International Organization, 62(2), pp. 289–322.

Ansell, Ben W. 2010. From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Becker, Gary S. 1980. Human Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cascio, Elizabeth U. and Ebonya Washington. 2014. “Valuing the Vote: The Redistribution of Voting Rights and State Funds Following the Voting Rights Act of 1965.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), pp. 379-433.

Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Kosack, Stephen. 2013. “The Logic of Pro-Poor Policymaking: Political Entrepreneurship and Mass Education.” British Journal of Political Science, 44, pp. 409–44.

Lindert, Peter H. 2002. “Voice and Growth: Was Churchill Right?” Journal of Economic History, 63(2), pp. 315–50. 

Lindert, Peter H. 2004. Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Manzano, Dulce. 2017. Bringing Down the Educational Wall: Political Regimes, Ideology and the Expansion of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stasavage, David. 2005. “Democracy and Education Spending in Africa.” American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), pp. 343–58.

 

Links and citations related to the Qualitative Data Repository’s Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI) Initiative

Elman, Colin and Diana Kapiszewski. 2018. “The Qualitative Data Repository’s Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI) Initiative.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(1), pp.3-6.

“Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI) at a Glance” : https://qdr.syr.edu/ati 

Previous
Previous

Episode 1.7: How Strong Legislatures Emerge, with Ken Opalo

Next
Next

Episode 1.5: Middle-Class Guardians of Autocracy, with Bryn Rosenfeld