Episode 1.12: Voter Suppression Goes Global, with Elizabeth Iams Wellman
Also available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts
This is a conversation about the politics of voting from abroad: in particular, about how governments manipulate emigrants’ access to the ballot in order to protect their own hold on power.
For the most part, elections are events that happen inside a country, as resident citizens cast ballots at local polling stations. However, around the world, about 281 million people live outside the country in which they were born, and a majority of countries give their emigrant citizens the legal right to vote.
The numbers here are not trivial. While exact figures are hard to come by, there are 80 countries around the world that both recognize voting rights for citizens abroad and have emigrant populations that add up to 5% or more of the national population. For countries with competitive elections, emigrant citizens represent a potentially critical voting bloc living outside the country.
Potentially is the key word here, though. For many of these citizens, the right to vote is only hypothetical because their governments often do little to make it practically feasible for them to cast a ballot. While a country like Senegal sets up 750 polling stations around the world, Kenya sets up only 5.
Our guest today, Dr. Elizabeth Iams Wellman, contends that that is no accident. She argues that incumbents strategically suppress -- or expand -- the vote from abroad to suit their electoral needs. A Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science at Williams College, Beth has recently published two articles on the topic, in the American Political Science Review and African Affairs, and is at work on a book project titled The Diaspora Vote Dilemma.
We talk with Beth about the often-hidden politics of emigrant enfranchisement. She tells us about the places where the vote from abroad has decided elections, such as Italy, Moldova, Romania, and Cape Verde. But we also discuss the tools that governments use to make sure that emigrant voters can’t sway elections -- tools such as limiting polling locations and enforcing strict voter ID laws.
Beth also tells us about her research process, including how she addressed a set of interesting measurement challenges -- such as, how to capture the electoral threat posed by the vote from abroad -- so that she could test her argument statistically for a large set of elections in sub-Saharan Africa. But she also highlights how her qualitative analysis of individual cases revealed competitive dynamics and strategic mechanisms that she could never have extracted from a regression model. And at a time in which most comparativists have found themselves unable to travel for fieldwork, we were intrigued by the remote interviewing that Beth did alongside months of on-the-ground research, and we ask her about her experience with conducting research interviews via video call.
Works discussed in the episode:
Baubock, Rainer. 2006. “Stakeholder Citizenship and Transnational Political Participation: A Normative Evaluation of External Voting.” Fordham Literature Review, 75, pp. 2393-2448.
Burgess, Katrina. 2020. Courting Migrants: How States Make Diasporas and Diasporas Make States. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hirschman O., Albert. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kernalegenn, Tudi, and Emilie Van Haute, eds. 2020. Political Parties Abroad: A New Arena for Political Politics. New York: Routledge.
Leblang, David. 2017. “Harnessing the Diaspora: Dual Citizenship, Migrant Return Remittances.” Comparative Political Studies, 50(1), pp. 75-101.
Paarlberg, Michal Ahn. 2019. “Competing for the Diaspora’s Influence at Home: Party Structure and Transnational Campaign Activity in El Salvador.” Journal of Ethic and Migration Studies, 45(4), pp. 539-560.
Wellman, Elizabeth Iams, and Beth Elise Whitaker. 2021. "Diaspora Voting In Kenya: A Promise Denied." African Affairs.